When actions by administrators are contested and the discussion results in no consensus either for the action or for reverting the action, the action is normally reverted. Droits: accder, rectifier et supprimer des donnes, ainsi que d'autres droits, comme expliqu dans les informations supplmentaires. Wenn Sie noch mehr Untersttzung wnschen, helfen Ihnen unsere Ghostwriter auch bei der Datenauswertung und beim Verfassen Ihrer Arbeit. Muster zum Download, einwilligungserklrung fr ein Interview einholen, inhalt der Einwilligungserklrung fr Interviews. They may block editors for behaviors that interfere with the consensus process (such as edit-warring, abuse of multiple accounts, or a lack of civility ). Alle Vorteile auf einen Blick, der Zitatgenerator ist das praktische, kostenlose Tool zum Erstellen wissenschaftlicher Zitate und Literatureintrge. The English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee may issue binding decisions, within its scope and responsibilities, that override consensus. Repeated reversions are contrary to Wikipedia policy under. The WMF has legal control over, and liability for, Wikipedia. Village pump Neutrally worded notification of a dispute here also may bring in additional editors who may help.
ArbCom does not settle content disputes or change policy. Edit summaries are especially important when reverting another editor's good faith work. Zu nennen sind hier etwa Umfragen, Diskussionen in Gruppen sowie klassische Interviews mit Einzelpersonen, beispielsweise mit dem Ziel, etwas ber die persnlichen Erfahrungen oder die Meinung der Befragten zu erfahren. Requests for arbitration The final step for intractable disputes. Destinataires: Les donnes ne seront pas communiques des tiers. However, for contentious matters related to living people, a lack of consensus often results in the removal of the contentious matter, regardless of whether the proposal was to add, modify or remove. Sysops will not rule on content, but may intervene to enforce policy (such as WP:Biographies of living persons ) or to impose sanctions on editors who are disrupting the consensus process. When an edit is made, other editors may either accept it, change it, or revert.
(This is also known as "asking the other parent".) Queries placed on noticeboards and talk pages should be phrased as neutrally as possible, in order to get uninvolved and neutral additional opinions. Contents, achieving consensus, editors usually reach consensus as a natural process. Posting a neutrally worded notice of the dispute on applicable noticeboards will make the dispute more visible to other editors who may have worthwhile opinions. In some cases, such off-wiki communication may generate suspicion and mistrust. Ein weiteres Beispiel fr Interviews in Hausarbeiten oder Abschlussarbeiten sind.
If an edit is reverted and further edits seem likely to meet the same fate, create a new section on the associated talk page to discuss the issue. A consensus decision takes into account all of the proper concerns raised. Zustzlich knnen Sie BibTex-Eintrge manuell zur Liste hinzufgen. The arguments "I just don't like it" and "I just like it" usually carry no weight whatsoever. Many of these discussions will involve polls of one sort or another; but as consensus is determined by the quality of arguments (not by a simple counted majority polls should be regarded as structured discussions rather than voting. Skip to main content, page Contents, latest.
Substantive, informative edit summaries indicate what issues need to be addressed in subsequent efforts to reach consensus. Accordingly, editors often propose substantive changes on the talk page first to permit discussion before implementing the change. What follows are suggestions for resolving intractable disputes, along with descriptions of several formal and informal processes that may help. Management plan department forecasted outputs, activities, resources for current year. This does not constitute an exhaustive list as much as a reminder that the decisions taken under this project apply only to the workings of the self-governing community of English Wikipedia. Discussions elsewhere are not taken into account. Forum shopping, admin shopping, and spin-doctoring. So funktioniert der Zitatgenerator schnell und unkompliziert. Consensus-building Further information: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution Editors who maintain a neutral, detached, and civil attitude can usually reach consensus on an article through the process described above. Decision making and reaching consensus involve an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns, while respecting Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Often, a simple rewording will satisfy all editors' concerns. They are high-volume noticeboards and should be used sparingly. Whlen Sie aus, ob Sie ein Buch, ein Kapitel, eine Website oder einen wissenschaftlichen Artikel zitieren mchten. Improvements to policy are best made slowly and conservatively, with active efforts to seek out input and agreement from others. Determining consensus See also: Wikipedia:Closing discussions Consensus is ascertained by the quality of the arguments given on the various sides of an issue, as viewed through the lens of Wikipedia policy. If the edit is reverted, try making a compromise edit that addresses the other editors' concerns.
Als Expert*innen knnen dabei etwa Personen fungieren, die bestimmtes Wissen besitzen, das beispielsweise firmenintern oder branchenspezifisch genutzt wird und im Rahmen der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit relevant ist. Richtiges Zitieren nach Harvard und mehr. Consensus cannot always be assumed simply because editors stop responding to talk page discussions in which they have already participated. It does not help develop consensus to try different forums in the hope of finding one where you get the answer you want. WP:Conflict of interest, Help:Edit conflict, WikiConvention/Conference or, wP:WikiProject Containers. In talk pages See also: Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines In determining consensus, consider the quality of the arguments, the history of how they came about, the objections of those who disagree, and existing policies and guidelines.
Requests for comment (RfC) Placement of a formal neutrally worded notice on the article talk page inviting others to participate which is transcluded onto RfC noticeboards. Editors should listen, respond, and cooperate to build a better article. Grippe aviaire : Tout savoir pour protger mes poules domestiques. Some matters that may seem subject to the consensus of the community at the English-language Wikipedia (en. Haben Sie Fragen zur Durchfhrung und Auswertung von Interviews? Mit unserem kostenlosen Zitatgenerator erstellen Sie wissenschaftliche Zitate und Literatureintrge fr Ihre akademische Arbeit im Handumdrehen! Lektoren von acad write untersttzen Sie zuverlssig und kompetent mit einer. Des Untersuchungszwecks, Hochschule bzw. Levels of consensus See also: The Arbitration Committee 's statement of principles on levels of consensus Consensus among a limited group of editors, at one place and time, cannot override community consensus on a wider scale.
Except in cases affected by content policies or guidelines, most disputes over content may be resolved through minor changes rather than taking an all-or-nothing position. Shoppez le meilleur pour votre animal parmi de 440 000 produits en stock! Sometimes merely asking for an administrator's attention on a talk page will suffice; as a rule, sysops have large numbers of pages watchlisted, and there is a likelihood that someone will see it and respond. Do not use either except at need. Wikipedia.org) are in a separate domain. Noticeboards Most policy and guideline pages, and many wikiprojects, have noticeboards for interested editors.